Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


TESMER v. GRANHOLM, 00-1824/45

The district court should have abstained from hearing defendants' claims where they could have been raised in pending state court proceedings; attorneys had standing to challenge a statute codifying the practice of appointing appellate counsel to indigent defendants, but that statute sufficiently protects an indigent defendant's constitutional rights.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/02/2002
  • Published 07/02/2002

Judges

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard