United States Sixth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

US v. CLARK, 00-6428

Trial jury could properly accept the testimony of one expert and reject that of another, in finding that defendant was not insane during commission of a bank robbery; sentence enhancement, for making a threat of death during the commission of the robbery, was proper based on the message contained in a handwritten note.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/24/2002
  • Decided 06/20/2002
  • Published 06/20/2002

Judges

  • Before:  DAUGHTREY and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  SIMPSON, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Sumter L. Camp (argued and briefed), Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, TN, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • William Cohen (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, TN, for Appellee.