US v. CLARK, 00-6428
Trial jury could properly accept the testimony of one expert and reject that of another, in finding that defendant was not insane during commission of a bank robbery; sentence enhancement, for making a threat of death during the commission of the robbery, was proper based on the message contained in a handwritten note.
- Argued 04/24/2002
- Decided 06/20/2002
- Published 06/20/2002
- Before: DAUGHTREY and MOORE, Circuit Judges; SIMPSON, District Judge.
- United States Sixth Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Sumter L. Camp (argued and briefed), Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, TN, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- William Cohen (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, TN, for Appellee.