United States Sixth Circuit

Trial jury could properly accept the testimony of one expert and reject that of another, in finding that defendant was not insane during commission of a bank robbery; sentence enhancement, for making a threat of death during the commission of the robbery, was proper based on the message contained in a handwritten note.

Appellate Information

• Argued 04/24/2002
• Decided 06/20/2002
• Published 06/20/2002

Judges

• Before:  DAUGHTREY and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  SIMPSON, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Sumter L. Camp (argued and briefed), Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, TN, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• William Cohen (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, TN, for Appellee.