Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. HARRIS, 00-6115

Convictions for crack cocaine distribution, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon were supported by sufficient evidence, and no Apprendi error is found where overwhelming evidence showed that defendant possessed the minimum drug quantity to justify his sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/02/2002
  • Decided 06/12/2002
  • Published 06/12/2002

Judges

  • Before MERRITT, SUHRHEINRICH, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Norman Lee Harris, Bradford, PA, pro se.

  • For Appellees:
  • Charles P. Wisdom, Jr. (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Lexington, KY, James E. Arehart (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Lexington, KY, Wende Marris Cross (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Kevin M. Schad (argued and briefed), Schad & Cook, Indian Springs, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard