Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. OSBORNE, 00-6763, 01-5022

Resentencing is mandated where the court failed to ascertain whether one defendant and his counsel read and discussed the presentence report prior to sentencing, and failed to make findings and rule on objections raised by another defendant to his presentence report.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/23/2002
  • Decided 05/30/2002
  • Published 05/30/2002

Judges

  • Before KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges;  and LAWSON, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael E. Winck (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Knoxville, Tennessee, Dan R. Smith (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Johnson City, Tennessee, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Jerry W. Laughlin (argued and briefed), Rogers, Laughlin, Nunnally, Hood & Crum, Greeneville, Tennessee, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard