United States Sixth Circuit

City's decision to develop, for a public purpose, a previously dedicated roadway located between two lots owned by appellant church was not a "taking" and did not violate the Free Exercise Clause, due process, or the Establishment Clause.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/22/2002
• Decided 05/07/2002
• Published 05/07/2002

Judges

• Before:  NORRIS, SILER, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Bryan Scott Hicks (argued and briefed), Cincinnati, OH, A.C. Donahue, Donahue Law Group, Somerset, KY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Mark B. Stern, Michael S. Raab, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Intervenor.


• For Appellees:
  
• Jeffrey Scott Lawless (argued and briefed), Travis, Pruitt & Lawless, Somerset, KY, for Defendant-Appellee.