United States Sixth Circuit

Summary judgment for employer was proper in a Title VII retaliation claim, where appellant failed to produce either direct or circumstantial evidence showing that the supervisors taking adverse employment action against him knew of his protected activity.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/23/2002
• Published 04/23/2002

Judges

• Before MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges;  TARNOW, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James M. Bolus, Jr. (argued and briefed), Thomas E. Clay (briefed), Bolus & Ragland, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Daniel Bensing (argued and briefed), Marleigh D. Dover (briefed), United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.