United States Sixth Circuit
US v. HENNING, 00-3559
Convictions for bank fraud and misapplication of funds reversed for plain error, where court failed to consider the viability of defendant's substantive convictions after his acquittal for a conspiracy conviction by post-trial order; possibility that defendant was convicted for culpability of others had a "substantial effect" on his rights.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/18/2002
- Published 04/18/2002
Judges
- Before BOGGS and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Thomas J. Kelley (argued and briefed), Eugene F. Canestraro (briefed), Cline, Cook & Weisenburger Co., Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Jonathan L. Marcus (argued and briefed), Department of Justice, Washington, DC, David O. Bauer, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Western Division, Toledo, OH, for Appellee.