Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. HENNING, 00-3559

Convictions for bank fraud and misapplication of funds reversed for plain error, where court failed to consider the viability of defendant's substantive convictions after his acquittal for a conspiracy conviction by post-trial order; possibility that defendant was convicted for culpability of others had a "substantial effect" on his rights.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/18/2002
  • Published 04/18/2002

Judges

  • Before BOGGS and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges;  CLELAND, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Thomas J. Kelley (argued and briefed), Eugene F. Canestraro (briefed), Cline, Cook & Weisenburger Co., Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jonathan L. Marcus (argued and briefed), Department of Justice, Washington, DC, David O. Bauer, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Western Division, Toledo, OH, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard