United States Sixth Circuit
US v. ORLANDO, 00-6312, 00-6409
Because the district court failed to make specific factual findings, such as when the defendant entered conspiracy and "the scope of the criminal activity the defendant agreed to jointly undertake," in determining the amount of laundered funds for which the defendant was accountable, the court erred in enhancing defendant's base offense level under U.S.S.G. section 2S1.1(b)(2).
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/01/2002
- Decided 02/25/2002
- Published 02/25/2002
Judges
- Before: MARTIN, Chief Circuit Judge; GILMAN, Circuit Judge; EDMUNDS, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jimmie Lynn Ramsaur (argued and briefed), Asst. U.S. Atty., Nashville, TN, for United States., Jerry Scott (argued and briefed), Scott & Kea, Murfreesboro, TN, for Lawrence Orlando, Sr., Charles R. Ray (argued and briefed), Ray & Frensley, Nashville, TN, for Tera M. Daniels.