Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. HAYWOOD, 99-4488

Where the record contained no evidence showing that the defendant intended to distribute crack cocaine he possessed on a prior occasion, evidence of that possession had no bearing on whether he intended to distribute the crack cocaine allegedly in his possession five months later, and thus, that evidence was improperly admitted.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/21/2002
  • Published 02/21/2002

Judges

  • Before:  DAUGHTREY, GILMAN, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas A. Karol (briefed), Asst. U.S. Attorney, Toledo, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee., C. Mark Pickrell (briefed), Nashville, TN, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard