United States Sixth Circuit
US v. CHILINGIRIAN, 99-2276, 99-2376
Defendant's challenges alleging inadequacies in the indictment, inconsistencies in the verdicts, and attacking the Bail Reform Act rejected, and conviction for conspiracy to commit money laundering affirmed; case remanded for resentencing because defendant was sentenced under the wrong guideline.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/13/2001
- Decided 02/13/2002
- Published 02/13/2002
Judges
- Before: JONES, SUHRHEINRICH, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Jennifer J. Peregord (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant in Nos. 99-2276, 99-2376., Kenneth H. Karam (argued and briefed), Peralta, Johnston & Karam, St. Clair Shores, MI, Jack Chilingirian, McKean Federal Correctional Institution, Bradford, PA, for Defendant-Appellant/Cross Appellee in Nos. 99-2276, 99-2376.