United States Sixth Circuit

Where the government introduced extensive evidence linking the defendant to drug trafficking activity, and the only evidence cited by the defendant to show an absence of predisposition was his own testimony at trial, the court did not err in refusing to proffer entrapment jury instruction.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/02/2001
• Decided 02/05/2002
• Published 02/05/2002

Judges

• Before:  KEITH, BOGGS, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Frank J. Marine (briefed), Patrice M. Mulkern (argued and briefed), U.S. Department of Justice, Organized Crime & Racketeering Section, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Robert M. Morgan (argued and briefed), Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.