Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. RODGERS, 00-6098

It is not error for the district court to reimpose a defendant-s original sentence after remand and deny a reduction in the sentence for acceptance of responsibility based on facts that were known to the court at the time of the original sentencing, but upon which the court did not originally rely.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/14/2001
  • Decided 01/25/2002
  • Published 01/25/2002

Judges

  • Before KEITH and COLE, Circuit Judges;  MARBLEY, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Robert C. Brooks (argued and briefed), Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas A. Colthurst (argued), Paul M. O'Brien (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard