United States Sixth Circuit
US v. RODGERS, 00-6098
It is not error for the district court to reimpose a defendant-s original sentence after remand and deny a reduction in the sentence for acceptance of responsibility based on facts that were known to the court at the time of the original sentencing, but upon which the court did not originally rely.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/14/2001
- Decided 01/25/2002
- Published 01/25/2002
Judges
- Before KEITH and COLE, Circuit Judges; MARBLEY, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert C. Brooks (argued and briefed), Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Thomas A. Colthurst (argued), Paul M. O'Brien (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.