Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


BAILEY v. MITCHELL, 00-3106

Prosecution may introduce video depositions of witnesses without showing their unavailability where defendant stipulated to them and his counsel cross-examined witnesses at the deposition, even if he had a different counsel for trial.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/05/2001
  • Decided 11/13/2001
  • Published 11/13/2001

Judges

  • Before:  BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • John Fenlon (briefed), Alison M. Clark (argued), Public Defender's Office, Ohio Public Defender Commission, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner-Appellant., Calvin L. Bailey (briefed), Mansfield, OH, pro se.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jonathan R. Fulkerson (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Corrections Litigation Section, Columbus, OH, for Respondent-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard