Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


RE/MAX INT'L, INC. v. REALTY ONE, INC., 00-4235

Courts do not need to expressly retain jurisdiction in settlement agreements in order to have jurisdiction to enforce them. The agreement need only have a reasonable indication that the court has retained jurisdiction.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 07/31/2001
  • Decided 11/09/2001
  • Published 11/09/2001

Judges

  • Before:  CLAY, GILMAN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Stephen J. Squeri, Mark J. Andreini (briefed), Jones, Daly, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, OH, Daniel H. Bromberg (argued and briefed), Jones, Daly, Reavis & Pogue, Washington, DC, Terence R. Quinn, Quinn, Day & Barker, Rapid City, SD, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Edward W. Cochran (briefed), Cochran & Cochran, Shaker Heights, OH, for Intervenor-Appellee., Daniel F. Lynch, C. John Koch, Ronald L. Marmer, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, Hugh E. McKay (briefed), Gina L. Schaecher (briefed), Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Cleveland, OH, Thomas O. Gorman (argued and briefed), John E. Hedstrom, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard