Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


IMPERIAL HOTELS, CORP. v. DORE, 00-1198

Michigan law on novations looks to the subjective intent of all the parties and a creditor's agreement to have a third party assume debt does not necessarily express intent to release the debtor.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/05/2001
  • Decided 07/18/2001
  • Published 07/18/2001

Judges

  • Before GUY, BOGGS, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David M. Caplan (argued and briefed), Caplan & Associates, P.C., Farmington Hills, MI, for Imperial Hotels Corp., Lawrence A. Hurlburt (briefed), J. David Perez (argued), Hurlburt, Tsiros, Allweil & Perez, Saginaw, MI, Rita M. Lauer, Wasinger, Kickham & Hanley, Royal Oak, MI, for Arthur P. Dore, Jay Ambe Corp., Mainstream Capital Corp. and Dore Development Co..

Copied to clipboard