United States Sixth Circuit

Defendant is not entitled to a reduction for acceptance of responsibility under USSG 3E1.1 where defendant's responses under oath were evasive and equivocal, and he supplied varied accounts of his conduct to the probation department.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/07/2001
• Published 06/07/2001

Judges

• Before:  KRUPANSKY, BOGGS, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• David J. Debold, Asst. U.S. Attorney (briefed), Kathleen Moro Nesi, Asst. U.S. Attorney (argued), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee., David B. Herrington (argued and briefed), Bad Axe, MI, Henry Garcia, pro se, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.