United States Sixth Circuit
INDECK ENERGY SERVS., INC. v. CONSUMERS ENERGY CO., 99-1433
Plaintiff's indirect and speculative allegations of antitrust injuries were sufficient to grant it standing where its only claim was in the company's capacity as a competitor in the marketplace, not as a defender of marketplace competition.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/23/2001
- Published 05/23/2001
Judges
- Before NELSON, BOGGS, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Mary Massaron Ross (argued and briefed), Plunkett & Cooney, Detroit, MI, Mark R. Brissette, Seward, Tally & Piggott, Bay City, MI, Laurence H. Tribe, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, Michael D. Freeborn, David C. Gustman, William C. Holmes, Joseph L. Fogel, Todd J. Ohlms, Freeborn & Peters, Chicago, IL, Robert P. Cummins, Bickel & Brewer, Chicago, IL, Alan R. Waskin, Gerald F. DeNotto, Indeck Energy Services, Inc. Buffalo Grove, IL, for Appellants., J. Peter Lark (briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Transportation Division, Lansing, MI, for Amicus Curiae.
- For Appellees:
- Eugene Driker (argued and briefed), Dennis M. Barnes (briefed), Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, Detroit, MI, Michael G. Wilson (briefed), James E. Brunner (briefed), Consumers Power Co., Jackson, MI, Michael J. Sheridan (briefed), CMS Energy Corp., Dearborn, MI, for Appellees.