United States Sixth Circuit
ANDERSON v. ROBERSON, 99-5355, 99-5356
A district court order that gives the plaintiff a choice between remittitur or a new trial is not a final, appealable order.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/04/2001
- Published 05/04/2001
Judges
- Before BATCHELDER and COLE, Circuit Judges; GRAHAM, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Warner D. Hodges, III (argued and briefed), Hodges Law Firm, Germantown, TN, for Arthur W. Anderson and Jerry Hollingsworth in Nos. 99-5355, 99-5356 & 99-5359., Alfred H. Knight (briefed), Alan D. Johnson (briefed), Willis & Knight, Nashville, TN, for Edwin S. Roberson in Nos. 99-5355, 99-5356 & 99-5359., Richard Glassman (argued and briefed), Richard E. Sorin (briefed), Glassman, Jeter, Edwards & Wade, Memphis, TN, for H. Stephen Brown, John S. Wilson, James W. Rayner and David J. Cocke in Nos. 99-5356 & 99-5359., Leo M. Bearman, Jr. (argued and briefed), Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell, Memphis, TN, Timothy A Ryan, Lucas, Thompson, Ryan & Sossaman, Memphis, TN, for Conwood Company in Nos. 99-5355, 99-5356 & 99-5359.