Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


JOHNSON v. US, 98-5563

Rule 33 motions based on new evidence and filed after the ten-day period in Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(3) must be treated as collateral challenges for purposes of the one-year statute of limitations under 28 USC 2255, and has no per se impact on 28 USC 2255.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/24/2000
  • Decided 04/16/2001
  • Published 04/16/2001

Judges

  • Before KENNEDY, SUHRHEINRICH, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Joe Ivory Johnson, Manchester, KY, pro se., C. Mark Pickrell (argued and briefed), Nashville, TN, for Petitioner-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • William Cohen, Asst. U.S. Attorney (argued), Nashville, TN, for Respondent-Appellee., Robert Anderson, Asst. U.S. Attorney (briefed), Nashville, TN, for Respondent-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard