United States Sixth Circuit

HESTON v. COMM'R OF SOC. SEC., 99-4400

Read HESTON v. COMM'R OF SOC. SEC., 99-4400
READ

Claimant's subjective complaints about alleged limitations did not support disability benefits under 42 USC 423(d)(1)(A) and 1382c(a)(3)(A) where they were not credible, given claimant's ability to perform other tasks.

Appellate Information

Decided 03/26/2001
Published 03/26/2001

Judges

Before: DAUGHTREY and MOORE, Circuit Judges; CARR, District Judge.

Court

United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

For Appellant:
Susan J. Haas (argued and briefed), Zanesville, OH, for Appellant.

For Appellees:
Randall E. Yontz, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Columbus, OH, Cynthia A. Brandel (argued and briefed), Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Chicago, IL, for Appellee.