Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. MITCHELL, 99-4272

District court's failure to comply with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(A) by verifying that a defendant and defendant's counsel read and discussed a pre-sentence report mandates a new sentencing hearing.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/19/2001
  • Published 03/19/2001

Judges

  • Before:  MARTIN, Chief Judge;  MOORE, Circuit Judge;  TARNOW, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David J. Graeff (argued and briefed), Columbus, OH, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael J. Burns (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard