United States Sixth Circuit
US v. MITCHELL, 99-4272
District court's failure to comply with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(A) by verifying that a defendant and defendant's counsel read and discussed a pre-sentence report mandates a new sentencing hearing.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/19/2001
- Published 03/19/2001
Judges
- Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MOORE, Circuit Judge; TARNOW, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David J. Graeff (argued and briefed), Columbus, OH, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Michael J. Burns (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH, for Appellee.