Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


HARDYMAN v. NORFOLK & W. RY CO., 99-4218

Differential diagnosis is an acceptable means of proving injury causation by process of elimination, and plaintiff is not required to present expert testimony on the specific issue of causation in order to establish a causal inference of injury.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/13/2001
  • Published 03/13/2001

Judges

  • Before BATCHELDER, COLE, and GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Howard M. Hackman (argued and briefed), Howard M. Hackman Co., Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Robert Leland Evans (argued and briefed), Craig R. Carlson (briefed), Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Columbus, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard