United States Sixth Circuit

State court's determination that Michigan's anti-stalking statute is not vague or overbroad was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, federal law as it existed in 1995-96, as established by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/05/2001
• Published 02/05/2001

Judges

• Before SUHRHEINRICH and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  EDMUNDS, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael J. Hodge (briefed), Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Lansing, MI, George D. Mesritz (briefed), Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Detroit, MI, Tina M. Weatherwax-Grant (briefed), Lansing, MI, for Amici Curiae Byrum., T. Lynn Hopkins (briefed), Kent County Prosecutor's Office, Grand Rapids, MI, for Amicus Curiae Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan.


• For Appellees:
  
• David A. Dodge (argued and briefed), Dodge & Dodge, Grand Rapids, MI, for Petitioner-Appellee., Jennifer M. Granholm (briefed), Janet A. Van Cleve (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Habeas Corpus Division, Lansing, MI, for Respondent-Appellant.