Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


BROCK v. CINCINNATI, 99-3121, 99-3584

Canine-handling policemen's claims for back pay and damages stemming from City's alleged failure to pay officers adequate overtime compensation for canine-care work performed at home while off duty, violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FSLA), where parties entered into a "reasonable" labor agreement concerning pay.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/19/2001
  • Published 01/19/2001

Judges

  • Before:  BOGGS, SUHRHEINRICH, and GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Stephen S. Lazarus (argued and briefed), Hardin Lefton Lazarus & Marks, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant., John Williams (briefed), Roshani Hardin (argued), City Solicitor's Office for the City of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard