United States Sixth Circuit
MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO v. DESOTO, Nos. 99-3988, 00-3571
California law governed employee ERISA plan, where policy holder was a California resident, the insurance certificate was signed there, and the medical costs incurred there.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/30/2000
- Published 11/30/2000
Judges
- Before MERRITT, KENNEDY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Mary M. Utterback (briefed), Thelen, Reid & Priest, Washington, DC, Curtis A. Cole, briefed, Thelen, Reid & Priest, Los Angeles, CA, for California Healthcare Ass'n, Amicus Curiae in No. 99-3988.
- For Appellees:
- Stephen F. Gladstone (argued and briefed), Michael J. Holleran (briefed), Frantz & Ward, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee Medical Mutual of Ohio in Nos. 99-3988, 00-3571., William F. Gibson, Robert H. Eddy (argued and briefed), Janice Aitken (briefed), Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant Denise deSoto in No. 00-3571., William F. Gibson, Robert H. Eddy (argued and briefed), Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant Jose Peppy deSoto in No. 00-3571., Janice Aitken (briefed), Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant Denise deSoto in No. 99-3988., Robert H. Eddy (argued and briefed), Janice Aitken, Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant Jose Peppy deSoto in No. 99-3988.