United States Sixth Circuit

Daubert and Fed. R. Evid. 702 require only that expert testimony be derived from inferences based on applying the scientific method to the facts of the case, not that experts have answers to all questions in the case.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/21/2000
• Published 11/21/2000

Judges

• Before:  MERRITT, CLAY, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Daniel E. Danford (argued and briefed), Benjamin L. Kessinger, Jr. (briefed), Stites & Harbison, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Matthew J. Smith (argued and briefed), Thomas F. Glassman (briefed), Smith, Rolfes & Skavdahl Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, Michael J. Cox (argued and briefed), Miller, Griffin & Marks, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellees.