United States Fifth Circuit
US v. Shabazz, 10-10553
In a prosecution for conspiracy to utter and possess counterfeit securities, defendant's sentence following the revocation of his supervised release is affirmed where 18 U.S.C. section 3583(e)(3) did not require aggregation of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release and affirm the district court’s revocation sentence.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/06/2011
- Published 01/06/2011
Judges
- Carolyn Dineen King
Court
- United States Fifth Circuit