United States Fifth Circuit

Defendant's convictions for possession with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marihuana and conspiracy to commit that same offense are affirmed where, even if the district court erred in admitting allegedly profiling testimony, it did not affect defendant's substantial rights.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/13/2010
• Published 12/13/2010

Judges

• W. Eugene Davis

Court

• United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel