United States Fifth Circuit

Defendant's convictions for possession of stolen mail and aggravated identify theft are affirmed where defendant did not dispute that he had agreed that certain stipulated facts were sufficient, and failed to explain in his briefs why the court should permit him to change his mind and challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/19/2010
• Published 10/19/2010

Judges

• Per Curiam

Court

• United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel