United States Fifth Circuit
Anderson v. Cytec Indus., Inc., 09-30333
In an action challenging defendant's denial of plaintiff's ERISA claim for short-term disability benefits, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) it was not unreasonable to ask for some objective showing that plaintiff's PTSD-related disability prevented him from performing his job; and 2) defendant's decision that plaintiff was not "totally disabled" was not arbitrary and capricious and was supported by substantial evidence.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/15/2010
- Published 09/15/2010
Judges
- Array
Court
- United States Fifth Circuit