United States Fifth Circuit

Convictions for defendants' involvement in a fraudulent home buying scheme are affirmed over claims that: 1) the government presented insufficient evidence to support one defendant's convictions; 2) the district court erred in admitting summary witness testimony; 3) it also erred in admitting evidence of unindicted transactions and in issuing conflicting limiting instructions; and 4) other defendant's trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, which resulted in prejudice to him.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/12/2007
• Published 10/15/2007

Judges

• PRADO, Circuit Judge:, Before JOLLY, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Daniel Steven Goodman (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, for U.S., Chris Flood (argued), Flood & Flood, Houston, TX, for Nguyen., Kevin Joel Page, Dallas, TX, for Tran.