Skip to main content

United States Fifth Circuit


Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co., 05-10576

In a second appeal in an Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) case, a judgment denying defendant's amended motion for judgment as a matter of law, and awarding plaintiff various forms of relief, is affirmed in part as to the denial of the motion for JMOL, and awards of back pay, liquidated damages, post-judgment interest, and costs. However, the judgment is reversed in part as to claims for reinstatement and interim monthly front pay and vacated as to a claim for lump sum front pay.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/06/2007
  • Published 09/07/2007

Judges

  • DENNIS, Circuit Judge:, Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Scott Alan Scher, Law Offices of Scott A. Scher, Kim Juanita Askew, Danny S. Ashby (argued), Christopher Donald Kratovil, James Hunter Birch, Hughes & Luce, Dallas, TX, for Palasota., David Wallace Holman (argued), The Holman Law Firm, P.C., Houston, TX, Hilaree A. Casada, Hermes Sargent Bates, Donald E. Godwin, Godwin Pappas Ronquillo, Dallas, TX, for Haggar Clothing Co.

Copied to clipboard