United States Fifth Circuit
Meza v. Truman, 05-10739
Affirmance of a bankruptcy court's holding -- that a trustee-s requested modification of a confirmed plan could not be considered because it was untimely as debtors had paid the plan balance while the modification motion was pending -- is vacated and remanded where, because the modification was timely filed and would become effective after a notice period unless disapproved, it precluded debtors from making their final payment under an earlier confirmed plan.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/16/2006
- Published 10/18/2006
Judges
- RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:, Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fifth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Angela D. Allen (argued), Law Office of Tim Truman, North Richland Hills, TX, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- James M. Morrison (argued), Jim Morrison & Associates, Fort Worth, TX, for Appellees.