United States Fifth Circuit
US v. Courtney, 05-30156
Grant of defendant's motion to suppress statements she made to federal investigators in a perjury case, pursuant to a claim that agents' tactic of obtaining inculpatory statements was designed to bypass Miranda, is reversed where the statements were not obtained in violation of Miranda, but even if they were, a two year lapse between unwarned statements and a third, warned statement was sufficient to render Miranda warnings effective and the third statement voluntary.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/30/2006
- Published 08/30/2006
Judges
- CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:, Before SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and CRANE, District Judge.
Court
- United States Fifth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- M. Patricia Jones, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Baton Rouge, LA, for U.S., James Phillip Manasseh (argued), Manasseh, Gill, Joubert & Rothkamm, Baton Rouge, LA, for Courtney.