Ross v. Marshall, 03-20989
In an insurance coverage dispute, the district court abused its discretion when it entered an amended judgment holding the insured vicariously liable for the criminal acts of his child.
- Decided 09/21/2005
- Published 09/26/2005
- PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:, Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
- United States Fifth Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Ronald J. Restrepo (argued), Max Christian Weber, Doyle, Restrepo, Harbin & Robbins, Houston, TX, for Movant-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Benjamin Lewis Hall, III, Sheryl Scott Chandler, The Hall Firm, Robert Alan York, Godwin, Pappas, Langley, Ronquillo, Byron Charles Keeling (argued), Keeling & Downes, David Wallace Holman, The Holman Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.