United States Fifth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Ross v. Marshall, 03-20989

In an insurance coverage dispute, the district court abused its discretion when it entered an amended judgment holding the insured vicariously liable for the criminal acts of his child.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/21/2005
  • Published 09/26/2005


  • PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:, Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and GARZA, Circuit Judges.


  • United States Fifth Circuit


  • For Appellant:
  • Ronald J. Restrepo (argued), Max Christian Weber, Doyle, Restrepo, Harbin & Robbins, Houston, TX, for Movant-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Benjamin Lewis Hall, III, Sheryl Scott Chandler, The Hall Firm, Robert Alan York, Godwin, Pappas, Langley, Ronquillo, Byron Charles Keeling (argued), Keeling & Downes, David Wallace Holman, The Holman Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.