Armstrong v. Capshaw, Goss & Bowers, 03-11092
In a legal malpractice action, the district court's denial of plaintiff's motion to intervene is affirmed where he does not meet the federal standards for intervention of right.
- Decided 03/28/2005
- Published 03/28/2005
- PRADO, Circuit Judge:, Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
- United States Fifth Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Donald E. Armstrong, Park City, UT, pro se.
- For Appellees:
- Wade Crosnoe, Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, Austin, TX, John Sepehri, Shawn W. Phelan, Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.