United States Fifth Circuit
MARTIN v. BOYD GAMING CORP., 03-30389 , 03-30459
Court dismissed plaintiff's Jones Act claim on the basis that she was not a seamen because the floating casino on which she worked was not a vessel due to the fact it was securely moored during gaming activity, and served no transportation function.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/08/2004
- Published 07/08/2004
Judges
- W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:, Before DAVIS, PRADO and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fifth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Eric Michael Daigle (argued), Law Office of Eric M. Daigle, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Peter Brooks Sloss, James M. Jacobs (argued), Murphy, Rogers & Sloss, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.