Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fifth Circuit


ARANA v. OCHSNER HEALTH PLAN, 01-30922

Because plaintiff's claim against Ochsner Health Plan fails as a matter of Louisiana law, no question of conflict with federal ERISA law exists.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/08/2003
  • Published 12/08/2003

Judges

  • EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:, Before JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges, and ELLISON, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Errol John King, Jr., Ashley Byrd Lowe, Juston M. O'Brien, Emily B. Grey, McGlinchey Stafford, Baton Rouge, LA, for Louisiana Managed Healthcare Ass'n Inc., Healthcare Recoveries Inc. and United Healthcare of Louisiana Inc., Amici Curiae., Edward H. Cooper, University of Michigan, School of Law, Ann Arbor, MI, for University of Michigan Law School, Amicus Curiae., Dana M. Muir, University of Michigan, School of Business Administration, Ann Arbor, MI, for University of Michigan Business School, Amicus Curiae., Thomas H. Lawrence, John Morris Russell, Lawrence & Russell, Memphis, TN, for Benefit Recovery Inc., Amicus Curiae., James L. Craig, Washington, DC, for Elaine Chao, Secretary, Dept. of Labor, Amicus Curiae.

  • For Appellees:
  • George Davidson Fagan (argued), Leake & Andersson, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Perry R. Staub, Jr., Michael Warren Hill (argued), Taggart, Morton, Ogden, Staub, Rougelot & O'Brien, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard