United States Fifth Circuit

Summary judgment in Title VII supervisor sexual harassment claims is reversed where questions exist as to whether a president was a corporation's proxy so that his alleged harassment is imputed to the employer, but summary judgment on retaliation claims is affirmed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/01/2003
• Published 08/01/2003

Judges

• W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:, Before DAVIS, HALL  and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Paul Leonard Veazey, Jr. (argued), John S. Bradford, Stockwell, Sievert, Viccellio, Clements & Shaddock, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Charles H. Hollis (argued), Ashley O'Dwyer Day, The Kullman Firm, New Orleans, LA, Benjamin W. Mount, Bergstedt & Mount, Lake Charles, LA, for National Communications Inc. and Hamilton., Edward J. Fonti, Jones, Tete, Nolen, Fonti & Belfour, Lake Charles, LA, for Hardesty.