United States Fifth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

HOLLIS v. US, 01-51035

District court's determinations are the most plausible analysis of conflicting expert testimony in a Federal Tort Claims Act case under Texas medical malpractice law, and a twelve-year delay in entering findings of fact and conclusions of law after bench trial was not prejudicial.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/03/2003
  • Published 03/03/2003


  • EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:, Before JONES, SMITH and SILER , Circuit Judges.


  • United States Fifth Circuit


  • For Appellant:
  • Walter L. Boyaki (argued), Miranda & Boyaki, El Paso, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Clayton R. Diedrichs (argued), El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.