HOLLIS v. US, 01-51035
District court's determinations are the most plausible analysis of conflicting expert testimony in a Federal Tort Claims Act case under Texas medical malpractice law, and a twelve-year delay in entering findings of fact and conclusions of law after bench trial was not prejudicial.
- Decided 03/03/2003
- Published 03/03/2003
- EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:, Before JONES, SMITH and SILER , Circuit Judges.
- United States Fifth Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Walter L. Boyaki (argued), Miranda & Boyaki, El Paso, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Clayton R. Diedrichs (argued), El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.