United States Fifth Circuit

District court's determinations are the most plausible analysis of conflicting expert testimony in a Federal Tort Claims Act case under Texas medical malpractice law, and a twelve-year delay in entering findings of fact and conclusions of law after bench trial was not prejudicial.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/03/2003
• Published 03/03/2003

Judges

• EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:, Before JONES, SMITH and SILER , Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Walter L. Boyaki (argued), Miranda & Boyaki, El Paso, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Clayton R. Diedrichs (argued), El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.