United States Fifth Circuit
HENDERSON v. HARO, 01-30852
Where a petition for habeas relief merely suggests that a petition will be unsuccessful under 28 U.S.C section 2255's requirements for successive petitions, section 2255 is not rendered inadequate or ineffective, and a petitioner is not entitled to file a section 2241 petition in connection with the section 2255 savings clause.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/05/2002
- Published 03/05/2002
Judges
- BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:, Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fifth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Phil Henderson, Sr., Oakdale, LA, pro se.