Skip to main content

United States Fifth Circuit


US v. DOVALINA, 00-10646

Where a reasonable jury could find that defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, the failure of defendant's appellate counsel to adequately brief the argument of insufficient evidence on direct appeal does not constitute prejudice.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/17/2001
  • Published 08/20/2001

Judges

  • ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge:, Before EMILIO M. GARZA, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jorge Luis Dovalina, Bastrop, TX, pro se.

  • For Appellees:
  • Chad Eugene Meacham, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard