Skip to main content

United States Fifth Circuit


US v. WELLS, 00-10134; 00-10266

Even if a weekly ledger of drug sales, destroyed at the end of each week, is a business record for purposes of the hearsay exception, oral testimony regarding the contents of the ledger does not suffice as secondary evidence of a business record under F. R. Evid 1004.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/16/2001
  • Published 08/16/2001

Judges

  • BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:, Before JONES, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Phillip A. Linder Dallas, TX, F. Clinton Broden (argued), Broden & Mickelsen, Dallas, TX, for Shenard Tyvon Wells., Franklyn Ray Mickelsen, Jr. (argued), Broden & Mickelsen, Dallas, TX, for Rodney W. Wells., James E. Polk, II (argued), Dallas, TX, for Loletta Denise Scott.

  • For Appellees:
  • Marc Ian Osborne (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard