Skip to main content

United States Fifth Circuit


US v. PETERSON, 99-20165

"[E]xplosive and damning evidence of training other telemarketers to make misrepresentations" after the events at issue in the instant case is admissible if offered to show the intent of the defendant and is not unduly prejudicial.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/08/2001
  • Published 03/08/2001

Judges

  • LINDSAY, District Judge:, Before DUHE' and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and LINDSAY, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Fifth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Ray Christopher Goldsmith (argued), Houston, TX, for Phillip S. Peterson., Thomas Donald Moran (argued), Schneider & McKinney, Houston, TX, for Theodore F. Clark., Rosa Alexander Eliades (argued), Houston, TX, for Sandra Lynn Holick., John Richard Donahue, Waco, TX, for Debra Wills O'Keefe.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jeffery Alan Babcock (argued), James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard