United States Fourth Circuit
Carlton and Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. PDR Network, LLC, 162185
Vacating a district court decision declining to defer to a 2006 Federal Communications Commission rule pursuant to the Hobbs Act requiring the court to employ the agency's interpretation of the term unsolicited advertisement because the Act deprives courts of the jurisdiction to consider the validity of orders like the rule and because the reading of the rule is at odds with the plain meaning of the text.
Appellate Information
- Published 2018/02/23
Judges
- DIAZ
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit