United States Fourth Circuit

Defendant's conviction on two counts of bank robbery is affirmed, where the district court: 1) did not abuse its discretion in refusing to permit defendant to testify in narrative form; and 2) did not err in requiring that defendant choose between testifying pro se in question-answer form and testifying in response to questions from standby counsel who would then control the case.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/21/2014
• Published 01/21/2014

Judges

• MOTZ

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel