United States Fourth Circuit

Summary judgment in favor of defendant-towns in a putative class action challenging the constitutionality of the issuance and form of automated speeding citations from defendant-towns that were issued under Maryland's speed camera program is affirmed, where: 1) service of the citations via first-class mail comports with due process; 2) the automated citation procedures do not violate due process; and 3) the use of the citations as evidence at trial does not violate due process.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/07/2014
• Published 01/07/2014

Judges

• GREGORY

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel