Summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff acting as receiver for The Bank of Asheville (Bank), in an action by plaintiff to recover the deficiency owed on a promissory note executed by defendant and payable to the Bank, is affirmed, where: 1) the district court thus did not err in concluding that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to the plaintiff's status as holder of the Note; 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in striking the surreply and affidavit; and 3) defendant has not come forward with evidence that creates a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the Note has been cancelled or assigned.