United States Fourth Circuit

Judgment that defendant properties owned by claimants were subject to civil forfeiture because the property derived from the proceeds of a health care fraud and money laundering scheme committed by claimants' son is affirmed, where the district court did not err in: 1) denying claimants' motion to dismiss; 2) denying claimants' motions to permit a witness and their son to testify remotely; 3) admitting their son's hearsay statements yet prohibiting the admission of their son's affidavit and letter to his attorney; 4) failing to give claimants' requested jury instructions; and 5) denying claimants' Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/26/2013
• Published 04/26/2013

Judges

• WYNN

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel