Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fourth Circuit


Gentry v. Siegel, 10-2418

In bankruptcy proceedings in which former employees of the debtor filed claims for unpaid overtime wages, the district court's judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's denial of a Rule 9014 motion and its refusal to allow the claimants to pursue class actions is affirmed, where: 1) the bankruptcy court was within its discretion to rule that the bankruptcy process would provide a process superior to the class action process for resolving the claims of former employees; 2) notice of the bankruptcy process to the named claimants was not constitutionally deficient; and 3) with respect to unnamed claimants, the named claimants lacked standing to challenge the notice.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/02/2012
  • Published 02/02/2012

Judges

  • Niemeyer

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Michael C. Righetti, Robert J. Feinstein

Copied to clipboard