United States Fourth Circuit
Gentry v. Siegel, 10-2418
In bankruptcy proceedings in which former employees of the debtor filed claims for unpaid overtime wages, the district court's judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's denial of a Rule 9014 motion and its refusal to allow the claimants to pursue class actions is affirmed, where: 1) the bankruptcy court was within its discretion to rule that the bankruptcy process would provide a process superior to the class action process for resolving the claims of former employees; 2) notice of the bankruptcy process to the named claimants was not constitutionally deficient; and 3) with respect to unnamed claimants, the named claimants lacked standing to challenge the notice.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/02/2012
- Published 02/02/2012
Judges
- Niemeyer
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Michael C. Righetti, Robert J. Feinstein